Math problems

Every once in a while I am reminded how much I really like Singapore Math. Not only has Myles at the age of 10 covered material I never did, even as a math major (tessellations), but the problem solving techniques lay the groundwork for future study.

In one of his early books, like second or third grade, there was a lesson on how to measure the perimeter of an irregularly shaped profile. The answer was simple: closely wrap a string around the shape for on full turn, cut the string, then measure the string flat for the perimeter. Simple, and the exact same concept as a basic line integral, but in tangible form.

The Singapore Math books also rely heavily on unit bars for problem solving.


Untitled

What I appreciate about these is that even in elementary school years, algebra problems can be solved without the introduction of x and y. These are different from how I was taught, never seeing a problem like this until seventh grade. There's no manipulation of 2x+100=410 at this stage. But the kids can see, right there on their paper, that algebraic equation represented in the bars. The hardest part for us has been getting Myles in the habit of drawing the unit bars when he starts the problem.

Already, Myles has solved simultaneous equations, without even realizing he was doing it. This will make that lesson, once he is in high school, that much easier, I am sure.

Untitled

I've really become a fan of this method.

I was about to publish this post over a week ago, but I hesitated after seeing something on my facebook feed. The schools in my hometown have switched to Singapore Math this year, and not without teething troubles. Unit bars were one of the biggest complaints from parents, just as I was ready to sing the technique's praises. I thought the post would be ill-timed, should anyone from home read this. Randy encouraged me to get this out there anyway.

Comments

Well, I'm glad you posted it. I love getting this kind of review, that goes into nitty gritty details.

I suppose at some point I really should look more closely at Singapore.

Jen Ambrose said…
It's worth a look to see if it fits in with your philosophy. I didn't look hard at Saxon, or any of the other popular ones. I just though Singapore would be a good start, and maybe an easy transition into an Asian school if he ever ends up in one.
Likewise, I didn't really look at Singapore. I read a few descriptions and thought it didn't sound like it would fit us. But I'm wondering if I dismissed it too soon.
Anonymous said…
After you praised Singapore Science a couple of years ago I tried it with my children last year. Both of them loved it so much that this year we also added in Singapore Math for them. My first grader loves it, but my third grader (who is doing the second grade set) hates it. He also hated Saxon, so I wonder if he just has trouble grasping math concepts. But my husband and I both like it. As a matter of fact, he experienced his first unit bar today, and as I was helping him with it I was impressed with how well it illustrated the subtraction problem. Also, with my 1st grader, they had number bonds, which I loved. It made adding and subtracting so much easier for her.
Jen Ambrose said…
Anon--We've stayed with Singapore Science this year, and I do have some caveats for the 5th grade books. We're skipping a few chapters that include material that I just don't want to cover with a ten year old, like human reproduction and population control. The biology, earth science, and physical science are otherwise fantastic.